Thursday, October 1, 2009

picnik_new_sample3_EDITED


picnik_new_sample3_EDITED
Originally uploaded by s00shi_88
edited version using picnik.

Image from picnik.com

picnik_new_sample3


picnik_new_sample3
Originally uploaded by s00shi_88
original unedited photo

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Reflective Synopsis

I’ve learnt a great deal doing this assessment piece. I’ve discovered new technologies that I’m really disappointed I hadn’t heard of earlier! Aside from that, I had forgotten how much our current generation is looking towards technology more than ever. One of the most interesting experiences I had was watching a video of George Lucas (Edutopia, 2007) when he was talking about his project of Edutopia at a Dreamforce Conference held back in 2007. One of his statements that struck me was when he was talking about the purpose of Edutopia:

...what we do is take the best practices of what education will look like using
technology...and out of that we realised it facilitates age old years of learning.

It was interesting that Lucas mentioned that ‘it (technology) facilitates age of years of learning’ (Edutopia). Furthermore I really appreciated the way Edutopia tackled education. Some of their philosophies (if that’s what you would even call them) included thoughts such as; making sure that students are engaging in ‘real world projects to learn subject matter’ (Edutopia); that there’s an emphasis on cooperation and team building elements where students can outwork conflict handling and collaboration. It also talked about integrating study with well-matured and new concepts; Edutopia also saw tests and portfolios to assess student’s performance as a key in developing their skills and learning development. However, it was the teacher element which was seen as the most vital as Edutopia emphasised that teacher’s bring ‘the human touch...the most valuable element in education by nurturing a student’s interest and confidence’ (Edutopia).


After taking note of these things I really appreciated what George Lucas was doing to a greater level. I realised that he wasn’t at all knocking the old ways of learning, in fact his statement of technology acting as a facilitator of ‘age old years of learning’ (Edutopia) seemed to bring to light the fact that today’s technology should be seen to ENHANCE these practices of learning that have been developed over centuries. Marc Prensky’s (2001) article on, Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, pointed out how the new generation of tech-savvy students (who Prensky affectionately refers to as Digital Natives) can get frustrated with the not-quite-up-to-scratch, Digital Immigrants who are still ‘migrating’ over to the new digital age. One of Prensky’s (2001) points about the struggle that a Digital Immigrant might have was how:
Digital Immigrant teachers assume that learners are the same as they have always been, and that the same methods that worked for the teachers when they were students will work for their students now. But that assumption is no longer valid. Today‟s learners are different.

As a self-confessed Digital Native, I can see how this could be very frustrating for not only a Digital Native Student but also a Digital Immigrant teacher. However, ICT should be seen through the lens of George Lucas. He mentioned at his conference how, ‘children learn out of curiousity’ (2007). This revelation is not a new one – it would be safe to say that children have always been like this since the beginning of time. I’ve realised now that ICT in a learning environment should not been seen as the enemy, but as a something that can tweak the curiosity of my students (who are most likely going to be more tech-savvy than I).
For now though, I appreciated some of the technologies covered in this course. Some of my favourites were; Picnik, Voice Thread, Voki and the Quizz Maker. I appreciated how user friendly it was – that even a Digital Migrant could not help but like the easy interface of these programs.


I’d also like to mention how I appreciated reading and discussing Ron Oliver’s (2001) Learning Design Model in the forums. His theory about; Learning Tasks, Learning Support and Learning Resources being integrated together is a powerful concept that I believe could work in any era. For instance, if we took Oliver’s theory to the education system 20 years ago, the Learning Tasks, Learning Support and Learning Resources would have still worked congruently together, but it would have conformed to the culture and technologies of that time. Was the way they did it 20 years ago wrong? Some might argue that it could have been, however, I believe that just as time moves on and people come and go, technology which is facilitating our age-old approaches to education are simply evolving and changing to suit its surroundings.


In conclusion, suppose I see technology in learning as clothing. Ten years ago there was not just another fashion going on, but I was younger and smaller. Fast forwarding to the present, I can’t get angry that I grew physically and that I can’t fit into those clothes I wore 10 years ago – there’s simply no point. It would be a waste of time and those clothes aren’t only too small but they’re dated! In the same way, technology in the classroom should be those new clothes that we are so excited about in the present time. We should appreciate these new technologies and approaches to learning now before they are outdated, disappear and another lot of ‘clothes’ come in.


References:
Edutopia 2007, George Lucas speaks at Dreamforce Conference, September 18th, 2007, The George Lucas Foundation, viewed 21 August 2009
http://www.edutopia.org/george-lucas-education-dreamforce-2007

Oliver, R 1999, Exploring strategies for online teaching and learning. Distance Education, 20(2), 240-254. viewed 21 August 2009
learningdesigns.uow.edu.au/project/learn_design.htm

Voice Thread




What a cool piece of software! I so enjoyed using this! I think using Voice Thread with photos or slides would be a great twist on an oral presentation or a teacher could use it to give feedback on a student's presentation. Although the recording time is short, it's still a neat way to share a story the way you want it to be shared.


File Storage!

Here is the picture I'd like to share with you all - it's a pic taken when I was in South Africa for 9 weeks and to make me feel like I was home I drew a lot...

http://www.mediafire.com/file/zzy5tegeduz/DSCF4079.JPG

I've used a similar online file storage system before and I love it! I already know the benefits of being able to send as many files to as many people as you like - all by simply sending them the link to the 'central storage place'.

I think teachers could upload videos, files, images..etc. to this a central place, and instead of emailing big files to many people, you can send the people the link to download the files themselves - brilliant!

Slideshare

My very short but hopefully interesting and informative presentation - enjoy!

Wikipedia

'Wikipedia is a free, web-based and collaborative multilingual encylopedia' (Wikipedia, 2009). Wikipedia has approximately 13 million articles, 3 million which are English and have been contributed by volunteers from all over the globe who have signed up to Wikipedia (Wikipedia). Wikipedia works just like a wiki, people can add and/or subtract information which means it's completely editable. This brings up the reliability of information that is posted in their millions of articles.

Because Wikipedia is not guaranteed to be total fact, I am always slightly apprehensive whenever I search for an article of interest using Wikipedia. Thomas Chesney (Anderson, 2006) who is a Lecturer at the Nottingham University Business School, concluded that although Wikipedia may be the preferred site for information, further research is encouraged before using any information in Wikipedia is actual fact.

However, Wikipedia is very convenient and could be used as one of the sources for students to take note of when they study. Students can then compare Wikipedia's information with other sources. This would encourage student's to research thoroughly and challenge them to sort through different sources of information to create a final product.

References:
Anderson N, 2006, Experts rate Wikipedia's accuracy higher than non-experts, Ars Technica, viewed 24 August 2009
http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2006/11/8296.ars

Wikipedia.com 2009, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Wikimedia Foundation, viewed 23 August 2009
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia